Corporatism, Commonweal, and Just Society – Lazar Puhalo
INTENT AND CONCEPT
Since we are going to be discussing corporatism and commonweal in various contexts, we should say something about these two concepts. Corporatism is a basic principle of fascism. It seeks to curtail individualism, not in the context of commonweal – the common good – but in the sense of top-down control and order in society. It seeks to organise society into a hierarchy of corporate [not to be confused with capitalist corporations] structures that require conformity, severely limiting or even curtailing altogether individualistic liberties and actions.
This structured hierarchy corporatises behavioural norms according to a given ideology. Every aspect of society can be corporatised in order to produce a culture conforming to a given ideology. Education, religion, morality, and every external form of behaviour must be regulated in order to impose this ideological concept in a matrix interpretation of the "norm." This corporate structure is imposed and enforced by an arbitrary system of law.
Such a system falls under a general ideology known as “fascism.” It can be a secular civil construct or a heavily moralistic religious arbitrary “theocratic” construct.
There are other understandings and levels of corporatism, but we are using the ideological concept outlined above, which is the general form used to create a fascist society, usually with a deformed and corrupted variation of crony capitalism which curtails individualism and individual creativity of a new form which might interfere with the centrally controlled structure of social order and economic structures.
While Canada was originally shaped with the "Red Tory" idea of commonweal as opposed to a radical, self-centred individualism, commonweal is understood as "the common good expressed within a political system of democracy and individual liberties." In this system, capitalism is regulated only to the degree that is necessary for stability, justice, and fairness. Civil society is also regulated as little as possible while ensuring such things as equal healthcare for everyone and a regulated social safety net that provides for the commonweal, the common good, for the whole of society without impinging upon civil liberties but ensuring the greatest scope of civil liberties that are permitted in a peaceful and cohesive society. This presupposes freedom in such realms as religion and reasonable concepts of morality, a variety of political parties within a cohesive and democratic nationhood. The operational ideology in such a society is "democracy and the greatest scope of civil liberties as can be afforded in a united and orderly culture." In Canada, this is well expressed in The Canadian Charter. We will be mainly interested in discussing the idolatry of corporatising religion and morality, the idolatry and blasphemy of an ideological, arbitrary authoritarian “theocracy.”
Within these concepts, there are variations, of course, but these are the concept within which we are writing. Having established this framework, let us continue.
‘Runaway Radical’ – Interview with Amy Hollingsworth and Jonathan Hollingsworth
Interview with Amy Hollingsworth and Jonathan Hollingsworth on Runaway Radical, Spiritual Abuse and Hardcore Christianity – with Brad Jersak Brad: When you sent me an advanced copy of Runaway Radical, perhaps you remember me politely telling you I’d add it to my...
Impassibility and Love – St Anthony the Great, with Q & A
The impassibility of God means precisely that He is love and, being God, does not change from love to any passion or emotion, but His only sense or feeling is love.
Response to Peter Enns’ Interview on Jersak’s ‘A More Christlike God’ – Michael Hardin
"Jersak’s book, A More Christlike God, is a direct challenge, a gauntlet thrown down, to the Janus-faced God of Evangelical Christianity." - Michael Hardin A rather longish response on Peter Enns interview with Brad Jersak on his new...
George MacDonald’s Influence on C.S. Lewis – Ron Dart
Ron Dart discusses George MacDonald’s influence on CS Lewis. What was it about MacDonald that led Lewis to attribute every page of his own work to the inspiration of MacDonald?
Was CS Lewis an Evangelical? – Ron Dart
The Hallowing of Hell – Caleb Miller
The belief at the very heart of christianity is the incarnation of Jesus. The light of the world, steps into the darkness and the darkness is transformed by his light. Note that I didn’t say the darkness was merely dispelled or disbursed. It is transformed. ...
“Would We Have Been Friends”: Piper/Keller contra Lewis/MacDonald by Ron Dart
Would We Have Been Friends? John Piper/Tim Keller contra C.S. Lewis/George MacDonald I’m not sure he (George MacDonald) was a Christian. —Tim Keller I don’t consider George MacDonald a Christian author. —Tim Keller ...
Review of David Bentley Hart’s ‘Atheist Delusions’ – by Wayne Northey
Book Review of Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies, David Bentley Hart, New Haven & London: Yale Divinity Press, 2009, 253pp. Surprisingly enough, this book is not really preoccupied with atheists (neo-atheists): a singularly...
Review of Pamela McCarroll’s ‘Waiting at the Foot of the Cross’ – by Ron Dart
Pamela R. McCarroll, Waiting at the Foot of the Cross: Toward a Theology of Hope for Today; Foreword by Douglas John Hall (Pickwick Publications, 2014). There has been, unfortunately so, a way of doing Christian theology that is more about...
Review of Brad Jersak’s ‘A More Christlike God’ – by Rob Grayson
Today I have the honour of reviewing Brad Jersak’s soon-to-be-released new book A More Christlike God: A More Beautiful Gospel. “God is like Jesus.” There has been an increasing chorus of voices making this proclamation in recent times. In my opinion, it’s been...
