Two Types of Spirituality: Chaucer or Bunyan? – Ron Dart

We live at a period of time in which two types of spirituality are vying for the hearts and minds of many. The “I’m spiritual but not religious” slogan and cliché is but a symptom of such worldviews at odds. The differences between these outlooks have a 500-year-old history and such perspectives continue to play themselves out in a social way and manner. There is the Classical tradition as embodied in a catholic and Chaucerian heritage. There is the Protestant tradition as embodied in a modern, anarchist and Bunyanist heritage.

Armageddon – Brian Zahnd

Tel-Megiddo The second Sunday after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, I preached a sermon entitled “The Road To Armageddon.” During those days of grief and rage when I should have preached the gospel of peace and forgiveness, I instead resorted to the...

What does the writing of dialogue add to the theology of love? – Essay by Jessica Scott

In this article, I shall focus on one divergence: the departure from the assumptions underlying ‘subject-verb-object’ structure towards a dynamic of reciprocity in which the speaker is both active and passive, both giver and recipient. This concept of reciprocity is generative for our theology in its bringing to bear a love which is at once engaged in all that we do here and now, in our contingent finitude, yet also in its endlessness is attached, necessarily, to infinity.